lopjewel.blogg.se

Windows 95 emulator without dosbox
Windows 95 emulator without dosbox












windows 95 emulator without dosbox
  1. WINDOWS 95 EMULATOR WITHOUT DOSBOX HOW TO
  2. WINDOWS 95 EMULATOR WITHOUT DOSBOX 32 BIT
  3. WINDOWS 95 EMULATOR WITHOUT DOSBOX WINDOWS 10
  4. WINDOWS 95 EMULATOR WITHOUT DOSBOX SOFTWARE
  5. WINDOWS 95 EMULATOR WITHOUT DOSBOX CODE

Sorry for the rant for those of you taking the time to read.

windows 95 emulator without dosbox

We already lost so much due to people throwing everything away and consuming new stuff every year. It's no longer about the games at this point.

WINDOWS 95 EMULATOR WITHOUT DOSBOX WINDOWS 10

Just like using Windows 10 is shameful and disrespectful to all tbe people who actually develop and preserve technology. The fact that GOG is repackaging old games to only run on an emulator without providing a drm free copy or at least an original iso is shameful.

WINDOWS 95 EMULATOR WITHOUT DOSBOX HOW TO

Nonetheless, even if nobody is using 95, plenty of people know how to maintain an XP machine properly in 2021. This requires MsDos 7.1 and some drivers. Seamlessly.īest of all, I am able to easily produce live booting Windows 95 USB flash drives.

WINDOWS 95 EMULATOR WITHOUT DOSBOX 32 BIT

It has 32 bit color, sound, and ever runs Age of Empires 2! Yes, you can easily run aoe2 onnn 95. 95 is the only version of Windows that runs on it. Windows 95 is my preferred version as it waa the least restrictive while still offering standard Windows api.įurthermore, my rig is an Ebox with a Vortex86 processor. It's a suicide mission to be an independent Windows game developer anymore. How do you expect developers to produce games this way? The old games we know and love from the past did not come from these restrictive conditions. They expect developers to support only new versions of Windows when Microsoft abandoned backwards compatibility and implements forced obsolescence. Gamers have become lazy, selfish, and clueless.

windows 95 emulator without dosbox

Why should anyone be expected to use or develop an operating system that is as intrusive and restrictive as government subsidized Windows 10.

WINDOWS 95 EMULATOR WITHOUT DOSBOX SOFTWARE

I'm hoping some spectre level exploit comes to light that ruins the whole concept so we can go back to writing software the right way.Our industry is dying thanks to blind support for Microsoft. The dev community has shown they can exercise the wisdom of a five year old who found daddy's gun. With great power comes great responsibility.

WINDOWS 95 EMULATOR WITHOUT DOSBOX CODE

I would be more lenient if they tried to write smart code in a stupid framework but its stupidity all the way down. They are inefficient, insecure and often the lazy ignorant assholes who make them cant even be bothered to write their JS clean. But these super high level languages that run in VMs are being horribly abused. I'm not saying everyone should only develop in assembly or even C. Because being dependent on the cloud for your dependencies is such a great idea. Want to go a step further? Develop your electron apps with NPM. Now they have no idea and to save their ignorance just throw extra layers of abstraction at it until their code only has to interact with some weird Fischer Price idea of what a computer looks like. It used to be they knew how their code interacted with a system.

windows 95 emulator without dosbox

It used to be that programmers actually knew how their hardware worked. It and similar frameworks like CEF are the opposite of the direction we should be going in. This on the other hand, is just DosBox running on what could possibly be the most inefficiently written platform in existence, with internet connectivity just a stone's throw away.Ĭonsidering that dosbox is already multi-platform, AND has a mature x86 emulation core all of its own, **AND** can boot win9x from a disk image natively- What reason does this even have to exist, except as a hobby project that is not meant to see the light of day?Įlectron is the embodiment of every joke about programmers being lazy ever made. Learning how to set those legacy deployments up in "Hard to break" configurations is useful, and can be very helpful to the poor souls who have no choice but to work with OSes that ruled the earth in the age of the dinosaurs. (vinyl cutters, CNC laser cutters, waterjet systems, metal detectors, even x-ray systems.) The hardware to keep those old systems running is aging and falling apart (IDE disks especially.) Being able to boot reliably and consistently in a guaranteed clean fashion each and every time with modern replacement parts (SDcard to IDE adapters and pals), makes such experimentation useful to at least a handful of people, making the silliness worthwhile. I have done some very silly things with win9x instances, including getting an instance of it to run entirely out of a syslinux memdisk, with drivespace compression turned on.įor the most part however, such silly things had some sliver of a sensible reason d'etre: Quite a few industrial systems run on 9x, even today.














Windows 95 emulator without dosbox